Most Kentuckians don't think insurance rates should be higher for the obese, but are divided on increasing smokers' rates

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

By a very small margin, Kentuckians think insurance rates should be higher for smokers if the insurance company provides a free smoking cessation program, but most don't think rates should be higher for those who are overweight, says the latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll.

The poll, taken Oct. 8 to Nov. 6, found that 50 percent of Kentucky adults said it would be justified to set higher insurance rates for people who smoke, while 45 percent said it wouldn't be justified. Five percent were undecided. This finding was basically the same whether the person had insurance or not.

The poll's margin of error was plus or minus 2.5 percentage points, which applies to each number, so the results were right on the error margin. That means in 19 of 20 cases, the results would be the same if the entire adult population of Kentucky were asked the question.

The poll found that most Kentuckians who have never smoked (63 percent) said insurance companies should not set higher insurance rates for people who smoke. Former smokers, at 51 percent, were less likely to agree with that opinion.

With about 27 percent of Kentuckians smoking, Kentucky leads the nation in smoking percentage, lung cancer and lung cancer deaths, which collectively come with a price tag.

Smoking cost the state $1.92 billion a year for health-care expenditures directly as a result of tobacco use, which amounts to $988 million a year in total taxpayer cost from smoking-related expenses, or $591 per household, Wayne Meriweather, chief executive officer of Twin Lakes Regional Medical Center in Leitchfield, representing the Kentucky Hospital Association, told legislators in December.

The poll also found that the majority of Kentucky adults, 67 percent, think it is unjustified to set higher insurance rates for people who are significantly overweight. Opposition was higher, 77 percent, among those who reported being in fair or poor health; among those who said they were in excellent or very good health, only 58 percent were opposed.

Kentucky ranks fifth in the nation for adult obesity, with one in three Kentuckians considered obese, according the "States of Obesity" report. This also comes with a price tag.

A study in the American Journal of Health Promotion found that a morbidly obese employee costs his or her employer approximately $4,000 more in health care and related costs every year than an employee of normal weight.

The poll was sponsored by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky and Interact for Health, formerly the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati, and was conducted by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati. It surveyed a random sample of 1,597 adults via land lines and cell phones.

Tennessee churches encourage healthier living

Sulphur Wells Church of Christ in Henry County, Tennessee, a few miles away from Paris, Ky., is challenging people to eat and think healthier, Amber Hall reports for Public Radio International.

Bob Palmer, lead pastor at the church, said, "We do draw some hard lines on alcohol and tobacco use and tattoos—we think, 'Oh, you're not taking care of the our temple that God has given you.'" He said the church hasn't looked at the issue holistically. "We've just kind of picked out the things we weren't going to do anyway, and we feel self-righteous about that—that we don't do them."

Then Palmer saw the County Health Rankings, a project by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation that measures health risks, Hall writes. He said that "when we confirm someone's spiritual health and give them a thumbs up and an A-OK, that's often the end of the rehabilitation process." However, he said if he were outside the church and had only the health indicator numbers to look at, "it might make me run in the opposite direction."

In Tennessee, the Governor's Foundation for Health and Wellness is helping groups such as churches improve health in evangelical hubs through the "Healthier Tennessee" initiative, which is a "wellness program and an online wellness tool that provides faith leaders with tips, ideas and actions to get their members healthier," Molly Sudderth, the director of communications at the foundation, said.

One of the suggestions is called Walk and Worship. "You can walk and pray for those you feel need extra prayers or are going through difficulties . . ." said Barabara Kelly, a public-health educator.

About 150 churches statewide are participating in Healthier Tennessee's "Small Starts" program, but none of the churches in Henry County have joined yet. Palmer said "there could be some stigma tied to healthy living in this largely conservative area," Hall writes.

"Right-wing religious folk have kinda viewed that as 'liberal' thinking," Palmer told him. "But that hasn't been correct, I don't think. At all. Just read through early Genesis, and the very first commission that God gives anyone is to essentially take care of this created world. We don't talk about that very often for some reason—to our detriment, and these numbers reflect that." (Read more)

Baby is born on Interstate 65 in Louisville during traffic blockage for President Obama's motorcade; father, nurse tell story

Nurse and EMT worker and baby
Photo from Floyd Memorial
Hospital Facebook page

A baby boy was born along Interstate 65 April 2 in Louisville because the road was closed for President Barack Obama's motorcade and they couldn't get to the hospital.

Because he stayed in Washington to announce the nuclear deal with Iran, Obama was three hours late, putting him in Louisville right at the beginning of rush hour and causing a traffic nightmare.

MetroSafe told WAVE-TV it received a call at 5:25 p.m. saying a woman was in labor on I-65. And just before 6 p.m., the baby, an 8-pound, 9-ounce boy, Arley Keith Satterly, son of Jessica Brown and Zakk Satterley was born, WHAS reports. “We couldn't get nowhere, so I called 911,” Satterly said.

After Brown and Satterly realized that the baby was coming and they were in "traffic gridlock," Satterly began to ask the cars around them for help, Shalanna Taylor reports for WLKY-TV. “I started asking people in different cars if they knew anything about having a baby,” Satterly said.

One of them was a nurse, Tonia Vetter, Gill Corsey reports for WDRB-TV. "I told the dad, I said, 'I'm a high-risk nursery nurse at Floyd Memorial'," the hospital in New Albany, Ind., Vetter said. "It actually happened very, very quickly. ... I think she pushed one time and the head delivered, and then she pushed again and the baby was born." Other drivers provided a shoestring for the umbilical cord and a blanket to keep the baby warm, Corsey reports.

"I've attended a lot of deliveries, but I've never delivered a baby on my own, and I've certainly never delivered one in the middle of an interstate," Vetter said. "God was definitely watching over me, the baby, the mom, because she could have hemorrhaged. The baby could of had a cord or a shoulder or any number of complications could've happened."

An ambulance took Brown and Arley to the University of Louisville Hospital, where a spokesperson said the mom and baby were doing just fine and were in good condition.

Living in a community with high income inequality is bad for your health, study says, and much of Ky. is high in inequality

A study by researchers at the University of Wisconsin for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation found that not only factors such as smoking and crime rate but also income inequality influenced lifespan, Margot Sanger-Katz writes for The New York Times.

This close-up of a New York Times graphic shows income inequality in Kentucky,
Tennessee and parts of surrounding states. Lighter areas have less inequality,
and darker areas have more inequality.

"It's not just the level of income in a community that matters—it's also how income is distributed," said Bridget Catlin, the co-director of the County Health Rankings and Roadmap project. "The effect of inequality was statistically significant, equivalent to a difference of about 11 days of life between high- and low-inequality places," Sanger-Katz reports. "The differences were small, but for every increment that a community became more unequal, the proportion of residents dying before the age of 75 went up."

Other research shows that income inequality affects life expectancies of citizens in countries around the world. Why exactly this happens is debatable. One idea is that though money buys better health, "It makes a bigger difference for people low on the income scale than those at the top," Sanger-Katz writes. That means a having very few poor individuals in an area will improve average health more than having very few rich individuals will reduce it.

Another theory is that areas where wealthy individuals can "buy their way out of social services may have less cohesion and investment in things like education and public health that we know affect life span," Sanger-Katz writes. Also, some research indicates that living around richer people is stressful, causing mental health problems or cardiac disease.

To measure inequality, the researchers compared incomes of individuals living in a certain area who earned the 80th percentile with the incomes of those who earned the 20th percentile. They recorded all those who died before age 75 and the age at which they died, calculating "potential life years lost." A person who died at 70 would have lost five years of potential life.

"For every one-point increase in the ratio between high and low earners in a county, there were about five years lost for every 1,000 people," Sanger-Katz writes. "That's about the same difference they observed when a community's smoking rate increased by 4 percent or its obesity rate rose by 3 percent."

Through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Americans at the lower end of the income spectrum are receiving health insurance, at least in states like Kentucky that have expanded Medicaid eligibility, and researchers will track whether those provisions will reduce the effects of inequality in the coming years. (Read more)

Higher-income Kentuckians' reported health keeps declining; reports from those with lower incomes go up, marginally

A statewide poll again finds that Kentuckians with higher incomes consider themselves in better health than those with lower incomes.

The latest Kentucky Health Issues Poll, taken Oct. 8 through Nov. 6, found that 55 percent of Kentucky adults who are above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL) said their health was either "excellent" or "very good," compared to 29 percent of Kentucky adults at or below 200 percent of the FPL. The FPL for a family of four in 2014 was $47,700.

However, the percentage of Kentucky adults in the higher-income category reporting excellent or very good health has dropped significantly since the poll started asking this question in 2008, to 55 percent in 2014 from 66 percent in 2008. So has the overall percentage of Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good health, dropping to 41 percent in 2014 from 49 percent in 2008.

The percentage of lower-income Kentucky adults reporting excellent or very good has been about the same since 2008. This year the poll found a 3 percent increase among those in this group who reported very good or excellent health. The difference is not statistically significant, but coincides with implementation of federal health reform, and and if it continues could show the law's impact.

The poll also found that 52 percent of adults age 45 and younger considered their health as excellent or very good while 33 percent of those over age 45 reported excellent or very good health.

“KHIP provides important data regarding the connections among a person’s age, earnings level and perceived health status,” said Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, which co-sponsored the poll. “By asking the same question year to year, we can spot trends in perceived health. The latest results are an important reminder of the links between poverty and poor health.”

The poll is conducted by the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Cincinnati and is co-sponsored by Interact for Health, formerly the Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati. It surveyed a random sample of 1,597 adults via land lines and cell phones, and has a margin of error of plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. That applies to each figure, making the 3 percent difference statistically insignifcant.

New diabetes cases in expanded-Medicaid states much higher than other states; 46,000 new Ky. Medicaid clients got screened

By Melissa Patrick
Kentucky Health News

New diabetes cases among poor Americans are much more numerous in Kentucky and other states that have embraced the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a medical testing company has found. The diagnoses rose 23 percent in the Obamacare states and barely rose in the others, apparently because state Medicaid programs are encouraging screening for diabetes.

Quest Diagnostics conducted the study by analyzing laboratory test results from all 50 states and the District of Columbia in its large database over two six-month periods, Sabrina Tavernise reports for The New York Times. The authors determined that because in January 2014, 26 states and the District of Columbia had expanded Medicaid and 24 had not, it was a good time to conduct this study, which is reported in the journal Diabetes Care.

The research team used the results of the basic test for diabetes, which measures a form of hemoglobin that has interacted with glucose, A1c. "In the states that expanded Medicaid, the number of Medicaid enrollees with newly identified diabetes rose by 23 percent, to 18,020 in the first six months of 2014, from 14,625 in the same period in 2013," Tavernise reports. "The diagnosis rose by only 0.4 percent — to 11,653 from 11,612 — in the states that did not expand Medicaid."

A Kentucky study indicates that more screening isn't the only reason for such numbers; the Medicaid expansion population appears to be more susceptible to diabetes than normal.

The study by Deloitte Consulting found that chronic conditions, including diabetes, were more than twice as prevalent in the expansion population than other people of the same age and gender who were on Medicaid before it expanded. That comparative group was considered to be the group most similar to the Medicaid expansion population, since the state lacks historical data for the expansion group.

The study found that the Medicaid expansion group had a 102.5 percent higher prevalence of diabetes than the comparative group. About two of every 1,000 in the expansion group had diabetes, compared to one of every 1,000 members of the traditional-Medicaid group.

About 46,000 of the 400,000 people in the expansion group had a diabetes screening in the first year of the expansion. Both studies suggest better access and utilization of preventive care and early diagnosis will promote earlier treatment and better long-term outcomes.

Kentucky ranks 17th among the states in prevalence of diabetes, according to the 2014 "States of Obesity" report.  The state Cabinet for Health and Family Services reports an estimated 233,000 adult Kentuckians have pre-diabetes. For county-by-county data on diabetes, click here.

Quest Diagnostics recognized that its study only looked at changes in raw numbers of the lab results from one company and did not have access to a federal data set. This has caused some to voice skepticism that the study results are a result of the Medicaid expansion. Others, while recognizing that the study did not "have the precision of a scientific drug trial," Tavernise writes, said "the changes in the numbers are real ... 23 percent versus zero," and that "the health-care law was the most plausible explanation for the findings." Another said, "for an observational study, it’s really very strong."

Kentucky Health News is an independent news service of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues, based in the School of Journalism and Telecommunications at the University of Kentucky, with support from the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.

Auditor will hold meetings in Prestonsburg, Princeton and Somerset to discuss his report on financial status of rural hospitals

State Auditor Adam Edelen will hold three public meetings in rural communities to discuss the findings of his special report about the financial health of rural hospitals.

The meetings will be held Monday, April 21 at 1 p.m. at the Mountain Arts Center in Prestonsburg; Monday, May 4 at 11 a.m. (CT) at the Caldwell County Memorial Hospital in Princeton; and Thursday, May 6 at 1 p.m. at the Liberty center of Somerset Community College.

The report, which covers fiscal years 2011 through 2013, found that as many as one-third of Kentucky's rural hospitals were in poor financial shape, with 68 percent of them ranking below the national average financially.

“Although closure may be an unfortunate reality for some," Edelen said in the press conference, "I believe more can and should be done to help these hospitals rethink their models of business in delivering health care in the 21st century." He went on to suggest rural hospitals consider hiring outside managers, merge with larger hospitals, form coalitions with other rural hospitals or find a specialized health niche as possible alternate business models to consider.

The report calls for the creation of a state work group to monitor rural hospitals, including making sure state law gives them the flexibility to retool their business models. Susan Zepeda, president and CEO of the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, suggested that the proposed work "could be incorporated into the work already under way under a State Innovation Model grant, which is engaging many sectors of health service in Kentucky in an ambitious, collaborative redesign effort."

Edelen said some of the primary problems faced by rural hospitals stem from the many changes in health care since the inception of Medicaid managed care, a decrease in the number of health-care providers, and an economic climate in some areas that doesn't support the current health payment model, which depends on the majority of its users to have private health insurance.

The report suggested that the Cabinet for Health and Family Services negotiate better contracts with managed-care organizations as it approaches the June 30 deadline, especially to address provider payments, stricter penalties for non-compliance and increased administrative burdens that managed care has put on hospitals. Edelen and Haynes sounded hopeful that this was going to happen.

Gov. Steve Beshear called Edelen's report "a dated snapshot" because the 2013 data used in the report does not include 2014 information,when the federal health reform was fully implemented through expansion of Medicaid to people with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Beshear said hospitals received $506 million to care for such people in 2014 while seeing significant reductions in losses on patients who couldn't or wouldn't pay.

Edelen's spokeswoman, Stephenie Hoelscher, said in an email that Edelen believes the full effect of all the changes in health care to hospitals' bottom line is still not clear, and his report establishes a baseline for critical analysis going forward.

Plight of woman needing lung transplant, who has fallen through the cracks of the health-care system, gets attention from CNN

Update: CNN reports that Kentucky issued a Medicaid provider number to the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, and the hospital confirmed that they now have enrolled in Kentucky Medicaid and are working to complete the enrollment of some of their physicians, all of which helps clear the way for Katie Prager to get her lung transplant.  "Kentucky Medicaid executives are helping us to get this done in a streamlined fashion that overcomes previous administrative hurdles and misunderstandings in this complex case," Wendy Zellner, a spokeswoman for UPMC, told CNN. Dalton, Katie's husband, has since been discharged from the Pittsburgh hospital where he received his lung transplants in November and has returned to Kentucky. CNN reports Katie and Dalton were only able to communicate through the doorway of her University of Kentucky hospital room because of his risk of getting Katie's infection, which could kill him.

A 24-year-old Kentucky woman with cystic fibrosis who needs a lung transplant to live is caught in the middle of a financial and policy battle among Medicare, Medicaid, a state agency and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, one of only two hospitals in the United States qualified to do lung transplants on patients with her specialized condition.

Prager at University of Kentucky hospital (Image from CNN)

"I feel like they're putting a dollar sign on my life," Katie Prager of Ewing, in Fleming County, told CNN. "I don't want to die because of money. That's stupid. Nobody should have to do that." Katie's story was first reported by The Ledger Independent of Maysville and excerpted in Kentucky Health News.

Katie longs to be with her husband, Dalton Prager, but can't until she gets her lung transplant because in addition to cystic fibrosis, she has an infection, Burkholderia cepacia, that is "horribly dangerous" to him, Elizabeth Cohen and John Bonifield report for CNN. Dalton, who also has cystic fibrosis, received his lung transplants Nov. 17 at the Pittsburgh hospital, and the immunity-suppressing drugs he takes for the transplants make him highly vulnerable to infection.

"I just want to make it to see our four-year anniversary in July and be able to hold hands and just hug. That's all I really want -- to be able to hug my husband on our fourth anniversary," Katie told CNN.

Katie and Dalton met on Facebook in 2009 when they were 18 and Dalton lived in Missouri and Katie in Kentucky. And though Katie's doctors had warned her many times that it was dangerous to be around other CF patients because of the risk of shared infections, Katie decided to meet Dalton, even after he had told her he had Burkholderia cepacia, CNN reports. They married two years later.

Photo from CNN

"I told Dalton I'd rather be happy -- like really, really happy -- for five years of my life and die sooner than be mediocre happy and live for 20 years," she told CNN. "That was definitely something I had to think about, but when you have those feelings, you just know."

Their health "quickly deteriorated, and within months, they went on oxygen full time" and had to quit work, CNN reports. They entered the Pittsburgh hospital together in August 2014 to wait for new lungs. Dalton got his in November; Katie is still waiting.

One month after Dalton got his transplants, UPMC discharged Katie because they told her "It would be psychologically good for her to get out for a while," she told CNN. After only three days out she began to have "serious trouble breathing" and tried to go back into the hospital, but was told she could not return because "she had used up her supply of Medicare days."

Medicare wouldn't pay for another hospitalization until Katie had been out of the hospital for 60 days. She is too sick to do that, and has since been a patient at the University of Kentucky, where she relies on the federal-state Medicaid program for the poor and disabled to pay for her care, and doctors have predicted that she won't live a year without new lungs, CNN reports.

Medicaid cannot pay the Pittsburgh hospital because it is not in the state's network of health-care providers. CNN reports that Katie's doctor wrote a letter to Medicaid begging them to make an exception, but the state denied his plea. In a statement to CNN, a spokeswoman for the state Cabinet for Health and Family Services said the hospital had declined to enroll as a Kentucky Medicaid provider. "Medicaid policies allow for a simplified enrollment process for out-of-state providers in such situations," Gwenda Bond, spokeswoman for the cabinet wrote, offering to expedite their application when they choose to sign up.

Hospital officials counter that Kentucky officials said they would have to "sign up hundreds of their doctors to accept Kentucky Medicaid patients," which hospital spokeswoman Wendy Zellner said is "an unusually restrictive approach and contrary to single-case agreements that we have signed with other state Medicaid programs. . . . It is up to Kentucky Medicaid to address this situation."

Katie has also since had a discussion with a federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services caseworker that "didn't go very well," CNN reports. Katie told CNN that the caller was "rude, mean, and angry" and "acted like it was just a pain to have to be talking to me," but said "she would look into her situation." On April 1, CMS spokesman Aaron Albright told CNN that the federal agency was "reaching out to the state agency," and later in the day Zellner said the state agency "has reached out to us to talk. So stay tuned."

The news cheered the Pragers, who continued to talk via Skype and work on their fundraising Facebook page, while dreaming of a future together, CNN reports.

Study of poor but healthy Appalachian counties aims to find community-based approaches to improving the region's health

Though some people equate Appalachian areas with poverty, David Krol seeks to "shine a light" on a different picture—one that reflects "how health can flourish across Appalachia," despite data that confirms economic hardship, Krol writes for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

While Krol was reviewing the Appalachian Regional Commission's county-based economic data, which compares economic indicators like poverty and unemployment rates with national averages and then ranks each county, it occurred to him to overlay this county index with the annual County Health Rankings.

For the most part, Krol said he found what he expected, "that the most economically distressed counties in Appalachia would also be in the lowest quartiles of health outcomes and factors for their state." But some counties that were economically distressed ranked in the top quarter of their state in health factors and outcomes.

"What was it about Wirt County, West Virginia; Pickett County, Tennessee; and Oktibbeha County, Mississippi, that helped them overcome significant economic challenges towards better health outcomes when similarly distressed counties in the same state did not?" he wrote.

The need to know why these "unexpected outliers" occurred has prompted Krol, with the help of the ARC and the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky, to study how these counties have accomplished this and to look at whether this could be re-created in similar communities.

"This approach is rooted in the belief that communities have the best solutions to the problems they face—as opposed to solutions driven by outside experts," he wrote.

It’s an opportunity to “go beyond the data.. to community conversations about what’s important,” Susan Zepeda, CEO of the foundation, told Krol.

Krol wrote, "Quantitative data can get only get us so far—it’s up to us to ask those critical questions of “Why? How? What can be done? It’s up to us to turn data into action."

Doctors don't tell most patients or caregivers about a diagnosis of Alzheimer's until the disease advances, advocacy group says

Every 67 seconds someone in the U.S. develops Alzheimer’s disease and most don't find out they have it until their disease becomes more advanced, according to a report by the Alzheimer's Association.

The organization's 2015 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures report says only 45 percent of people with the disease, or their caregivers, were told their diagnosis by their doctor.

One reason, the report says, is that they don't want to cause the patient emotional distress, but the report says studies have found that "few patients become depressed or have other long-term emotional problems" when they learn of their diagnosis.

The Alzheimer's Association says early disclosure of the diagnosis "should be standard practice" because it allows the patient to participate in early decision making about their care plans, deal with legal and financial issues, decide if they would like to participate in research, and gives them time to fulfill lifelong plans. The association said in the release that not enough resources and education are in place to help medical providers with "best practices for telling patients and their families."

"Telling patients the truth about their diagnosis allows them to seek treatment early, when it’s likely to be more effective, and gives them a voice in planning how they want to live the rest of their lives," DeeAnna Esslinger, executive director of the Greater Kentucky and Southern Indiana Chapter of the Alzheimer’s Association, said in a press release.

The report says an estimated 5.3 million Americans have Alzheimer’s disease, including 68,000 Kentuckians. And barring the development of medical breakthroughs, the report says the number of Americans with the disease will rise to 13.8 million by 2050. Other items from the report:

• Almost half a million people age 65 or older will develop Alzheimer’s in the U.S. this year.
• By 2050, an American will develop the disease an average of every 33 seconds.
• Two-thirds of Americans over age 65 with Alzheimer’s (3.2 million) are women.
• Alzheimer’sis the sixth-leading cause of death in the U.S.
• In Kentucky, 1,462 people died with Alzheimer’s in 2012, a 74 percent increase since 2000.
• Nationwide from 2000-2013, the number of Alzheimer’s deaths increased 71 percent, while deaths from other major diseases decreased.

The cost to care for Americans with Alzheimer's and other dementias in 2015 are estimated at $226 billion, of which $153 billion is the cost to Medicare and Medicaid alone, making Alzheimer's the costliest disease to society, the release says. The report projected this cost will increase to more than $1 trillion in 2050.

“Alzheimer’s is a triple threat unlike any other disease — with soaring prevalence, lack of effective treatment and enormous costs. Promising research is ready for the pipeline, but there’s an urgent need to accelerate federal funding to find treatment options that effectively prevent and treat Alzheimer’s," Beth Kallmyer, vice president of constituent services for the Alzheimer’s Association, said in a release.

Initial research is promising for an ancient combination of natural ingredients to kill MRSA, an antibiotic-resistant superbug

Researchers in England say an ancient folk cure might help kill the superbug MRSA, Justin Moyer reports for The Washington Post.

MRSA, or methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, is among the infections that have grown resistant to antibiotics because the drugs have been overused, and scientists have been fighting it technologically, Moyer writes.

But researchers have recently found that MRSA is "vulnerable to an ancient remedy" made of garlic, some onion or leek, copper, wine and oxgall, or cow’s bile. Garlic and copper have been thought to have antibiotic or antimicrobial properties.

“We were absolutely blown away by just how effective the combination of ingredients was,” Freya Harrison, one of the researchers from the University of Nottingham, told the BBC, Moyer reports.

The remedy, called eye salve, was found in a manuscript written in Old English from the 10th century called "Bald's Leechbook," a well-respected physician's desk reference from that time, Moyer reports.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated MRSA contributed to the deaths of more than 5,000 people in the United States in 2013, Moyer reports. Kentucky has the third highest rate of MRSA bloodstream infections in the nation, according to the National Healthcare Safety Network. Moyer writes that "some say it could eventually kill more people than cancer."

Moyer notes that the abstract for a conference at which the research will be presented cautions that "oxgall was no cure-all," saying, "Antibacterial activity of a substance in laboratory trials does not necessarily mean the historical remedy it was taken from actually worked in toto.”

Christina Lee, an associate professor in Viking studies at Nottingham, told Moyer "that it was the combination of ingredients that proved effective against MRSA, which shows that people living in medieval times were not as barbaric as popularly thought."

Polling shows Kentucky ranks third in share of residents, 24.5 percent, who say they take mood-altering drugs every day

Kentucky is the place to be for mood-altering drugs. The state ranked third in a Gallup Organization study that asked 450 adults in each state how often they use drugs and medications to affect their mood or relax them, Christopher Ingraham reports for The Washington Post. West Virginia led, with 28.1 percent of respondents saying they use mood-altering drugs every day, Rhode Island was second at 25.9 percent, but Kentucky was not far behind at 24.5 percent.

Nationally, 18.9 percent of respondents said they take drugs almost every day, while 62.2 percent said they never do, 13.1 percent said they rarely do and 5 percent said they sometimes do.

The way the question was worded allows for errors, Ingraham writes. The question asked about drugs and medications, but didn't specify which ones, and didn't mention alcohol or tobacco. That left interpretation of the question up to individual respondents.

A recent National Survey of Drug Use and Health said that at least 71 percent of American adults drank in the past year, and 56 percent drank in the past month, which if true, could raise the rates in most states, if respondents were to consider alcohol a mood-altering drug. (Read more) (To view this interactive Post map click here)